Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home (page 2)

Tag Archives: June 30 2012 issue

Consumer protection – Driver’s Privacy Protection Act – Advertising inserts

Where a putative class action was brought alleging that the defendant violated the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act by sending out advertisements along with motor vehicle registration renewal notices pursuant to a contract with the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles, a ...

Read More »

Arbitration – Employment agreement

It is up to an arbitrator, not a U.S. District Court judge, to decide whether an arbitration clause in an employment agreement is unenforceable in that it imposes a one-year limitations period. Escobar-Noble v. Luxury Hotels International of Puerto Rico, ...

Read More »

Taxation – Equal protection

A city that had a rational basis for forgiving the tax debts of some property owners but not others did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. Armour v. City of Indianapolis, No. 11-161. June 4, 2012. Lawyers USA No. 993-3852

Read More »

What can Jay-Z and Beyoncé teach your company?

U.S. trademark applications are matters of public record. When celebrity super-couple Jay-Z and Beyoncé filed a trademark application for their infant daughter’s name, Blue Ivy Carter, the public took notice. So should your company.

Read More »

Employers ignore new EEOC guidance at their peril

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently issued a formal “enforcement guidance” addressing the applicability of the chief federal employment discrimination statute, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, to the use of criminal conviction and arrest records ...

Read More »

Relying on ERISA to protect executive deferred compensation

Suppose the deferred compensation component of an executive’s change of control or employment agreement, or the company’s executive compensation plan, contains hurdles or exceptions to vesting or, even, a cliff vesting provision — such as requiring employment for at least ...

Read More »

How shoe soles might impact mobile iconography

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently heard arguments in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent, an appeal that considers (or, some might say, reconsiders) the protectability of a single color as a trademark to identify the source of a ...

Read More »