New England Biz Law Update

This is the final installment in a Succeeding In-House series, in which the author explains why basic legal skills are not enough for long-term success as an in-house attorney. This column explores some of the techniques to use when wielding ...

Companies and in-house counsel rely on a wide array of consultants and professionals, such as accountants, brokers, investment bankers and public relations experts. What becomes of attorney-client privileged information when it is disclosed to these consultants? The general rule is ...

Securities lawyers are closely monitoring the outcome of a motion for reconsideration in a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals fraud case that has many claiming the court has gone too far. In SEC v. Tambone, the court radically expanded the scope of liability in securities fraud investigations by holding that the conduct of two mutual fund executives could constitute an “implied fraudulent statement” even though they did not actually make any false or misleading statements.

Tax-accrual workpapers prepared by a company to determine how much cash it should reserve in case the IRS disputed its tax returns were protected by the work-product doctrine, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

An obscure new law that is best known for prohibiting lead in toys will affect a majority of businesses in New England — including those that have nothing to do with children’s products — in profound ways, say lawyers who have been tracking the legislation.

Employment lawyers warn that a recently filed bill calling for a ban of all non-compete agreements in Massachusetts would be a crippling blow for local businesses

Join us at In-House Leaders in the Law, an awards event honoring a select group of in-house counsel for their accomplishments.

The first law signed by President Barack Obama, which overturned a U.S. Supreme Court ruling and gave employees more time to file unequal pay-bias claims, is being hailed by proponents as a way to ensure equality in the workplace. But ...

Even though e-mail was factually correct

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision permitting a worker who was fired after answering questions during an internal sex harassment inquiry to pursue a Title VII claim has the defense and plaintiffs’ bars divided over its impact. While some employment ...