An information technology consulting firm could not enforce a non-compete agreement against employees who quit after the company cut their base salaries but gave them an opportunity to make up the difference through bonuses based on billable hours, a Superior ...
Read More »All fired up
Reebok CEO Paul Fireman and lawyers from Boston’s Goulston & Storrs used to enter the courtroom side by side. Those days appear to be over.
Tagged with: March 31 2012 issue
Read More »Piper and prejudice
An ex-DLA Piper secretary has abruptly pulled the plug on a sexual harassment complaint she lodged against the Boston law firm and a former supervisor.
Tagged with: March 31 2012 issue
Read More »Company, CEO sanctioned for destroying evidence
A Superior Court judge in Boston’s Business Litigation Session has ruled that a company that intentionally destroyed tens of thousands of pages of evidence must pay the plaintiffs’ counsel fees.
Tagged with: March 31 2012 issue
Read More »Plaintiffs’ lawyers, EEOC see rise in pregnancy bias claims
The slow economy and competitive labor market may be contributing to an upswing in discrimination claims by pregnant women in the workplace, employment attorneys say.
Tagged with: March 31 2012 issue
Read More »Settlement doesn’t bar deceit, fiduciary claims
A couple who claimed an investment firm fraudulently induced them into settling litigation over an unsuccessful investment deal could subsequently sue the company for deceit and breach of fiduciary duty, even though they were represented by counsel at the time ...
Tagged with: March 31 2012 issue
Read More »Split panel finds retaliation OK in mutual fund industry
A provision in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act protecting whistleblowers from retaliation does not extend to employees of private companies that act under contract as advisers to, and managers of, mutual funds, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has decided in ...
Tagged with: Feb. 29 2012 issue
Read More »City’s workforce retention ordinance upheld by court
The Rhode Island city of Providence could require hotels to retain their employees for three months in the event of a change in ownership, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has found.
Tagged with: Feb. 29 2012 issue
Read More »‘Misclassified’ worker can file third-party lawsuit
A truck driver who brought a purported class action alleging that companies he worked for had violated state and federal wage laws by misclassifying drivers as independent contractors could also sue a management-services firm for providing the companies with independent ...
Tagged with: Feb. 29 2012 issue
Read More »NLRB protects class actions, sends employers scrambling
Just when attorneys thought the issue of class action waivers in mandatory arbitration clauses had been settled by the U.S. Supreme Court once and for all, a National Labor Relations Board ruling has called into question the ability of employers ...
Tagged with: Feb. 29 2012 issue
Read More »