Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home (page 9)

Author Archives: Eric T. Berkman

Appeal of counsel fee award deemed timely

A group of union benefit funds that claimed an employer violated a collective bargaining agreement filed a timely appeal, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has found in a case of first impression.

Read More »

Class decertified in mortgage case

African-American borrowers who claimed a lender’s policies caused them to pay more than whites in securing home mortgage loans could not rely on a nationwide statistical analysis in order to gain certification as a class, a U.S. District Court judge ...

Read More »

Third-party severance claims allowed by judge

Hospital executives who had been terminated after the hospital was sold in bankruptcy were entitled to bring severance claims against the buyer despite the existence of a “no-third-party-beneficiaries clause” in the asset purchase agreement, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge in ...

Read More »

Unsigned P&S enforceable in wake of emails

A series of emails between a buyer and seller of real estate containing the material terms of an offer to purchase and indicating an acceptance of those terms was sufficient to create a binding contract, a Superior Court judge in ...

Read More »

Ex-employees’ work for competitor OK

An employer could not rely on the “inevitable disclosure doctrine” to obtain a preliminary injunction restricting the scope of the work two former employees could perform after joining a competitor, a U.S. District Court judge in Boston has ruled.

Read More »

UCC suit over bank security can proceed

A bank that required customers to answer security questions before it cleared any electronic withdrawal of more than $1, but allegedly failed to implement further security measures to detect and address suspicious transactions, could be sued under Article 4A of ...

Read More »

Goodwin Procter not disqualified from patent case

A law firm representing the plaintiffs in a patent infringement suit was not subject to disqualification based on the fact that two of its partners, while associated with a different firm in 2004, had a one-day meeting with the defendant ...

Read More »